Podcast
2000 Mules Movie Review and Debate
Episode Transcript
Lance: Oh boy, oh boy, this broadcast is so hot today. I don’t know how I’m going to be able to put it on half the social media channels. I want to put it on. We’re going to cover the Denish, this 2000 Mules documentary which went off like a bomb and all over the country you’re going to hear more and more about it. Because it is definitive evidence and proof of the shenanigans that went on in the five swing states with data, science, proof, evidence. You’ve been waiting for and it’s so powerful. I think it’s going to spark a complete revolution in terms of how voting is going to be done in the future.
Now, this is important. “ExpressVPN.com/lance”. I’m giving you the address of where you want to go in order to protect yourself from the kind of invasive surveillance and tracking that the government is doing. The FBI conducted warrantless searches of Americans and more than doubled from 2020 to 2021 nearly 3.4 million Americans were being surveilled by the government. This is shocking and now I’m telling you now, you need to get a hold of “ExpressVPN.com/lance”. You get yourself like 90 days free I think if you use our promo code. I recommend it, our team utilizes it and you want to protect yourself, your data, your identity, and you want as much autonomy from this as big brother government as possible. Don’t miss today’s broadcast.
Welcome everyone to today’s breaking news broadcast and here I am with my corduroy jacket and scarf. Because the air conditioning broke in our office and therefore the air conditioning is being tested and I’m now in the refrigeration unit of I don’t know what’s Costco. That’s what I feel like. Ever going to that area in Costco where you’re going to the vegetable section or the fruit section. It’s freezing cold back there. That’s what the office is like. But Mercedes Sparks is evidently not affected by that. She’s completely festooned in her summer attire her Floridian outfit
Mercedes: I just took the sweater off because I was like, no, I wore this nice dress today. So, I’m going to brave the cold.
Lance: I appreciate that. Carl and Jonathan are over there. They’re in their neutral look, comfortably sitting over there. Am I the only guy who’s arctic sensitive today in the office?
Carl: Yes,
Mercedes: Well, Carl’s got the Fab 4 shirt on too.
Lance: Well, he does have and that’s always going to warm the cockles of your heart, if you have the Fab 4 festooned on your, regaled on your chest like that. Alright, now here’s where I want to go, but get the camera over there. I want you to see it. Come on guys. As I’m giving, I’m setting up the camera team over there. That’s the Fab 4. That’s the artwork of Hank Kunaman. Also, I think I have him behind my head here but you can’t see that. I got artwork there behind my head.
Alright, so look. Lots of things are breaking news today and that’s the reason why I want to jump right into the big story. Everybody’s talking about which is it a surprise that Roe V Wade is the issue that it is and once again here’s the thing that always intrigues me. The real story is not Roe V Wade. The real story is the fact that the States in America are starting to break apart in this culture war, so that they’re expressing their different priorities and values. And at the heart of this whole Roe V Wade debate, it isn’t really as it ought to be about the life of the unborn and when is the baby in the womb actually recognized as a human being. That’s what the case argument really is about.
But it’s going to be dropped down to a women’s right to protect herself from the invasive overreach of what, religious government or something like that. That’s how the left is going to position it but I don’t think it’s going to work. I think they can only gin up and create a foment in their based to a certain point and it’s going to fall apart. Because this really is a question as who gets to decide what the states are going to do as regards their own their own legislation on important matters? This goes to the idea that the states have far more power in the United States than the federal government if the states ever utilize it and that’s what this is really going to end up being.
So, let’s but we got that. I also want to talk about a lot of the information that we’re missing which is how is the battle for the for the soul of the nation actually playing out. I’m going to give you a force field analysis is what it’s called on the big five fronts that we’re advancing on now, that show that there’s major evidence that the left and the ideological power of the left is having to back up consistently. So, Mercedes, let’s start with, you’ve been doing some research on the case. You’ve been reading the document.
Now, what is already public knowledge is that this 62-page confidential briefing that came from Justice Alito is supposed to be an internal document. Where they refine and nuance what they’re going to be saying in public. And this was supposed to be coming out like in July or something. But because of a leak that looks like it came from Sotomayor’s clerks. It’s always you notice this it’s like the self-control on the left is always a problem. They will break the law at every point where they want to push something. It’s kind of like when Comey was leaking stuff to the New York Times, well this gets leaked to the New York Times.
The Democrats and the media work together with the activist and the to control the American narrative. But the American populous movement, which is expressed in the states and this gathering storm of unified consensus in the country is pushing back in schools, on school boards you see the whack back at Disney and Florida. I believe it’s systemic meaning. The nation itself is finding mechanisms to voice their Democratic right to push back on the overreach of government and the mandating of things which haven’t been successfully sold to the American people and that’s the whole premise of how democracy has to work.
You have to sell America on an idea. You can’t just force it. What happens on the left is that they can’t get what they want by selling it. They’ll get it by virtue of litigation. They’ll find a court to impose it and this produces resentment after a while. That resentment is beginning to foam it on several fronts and it’s finally finding it’s organizational alliances to be able to push back. It’s like a team sport. You have to have organizations show up against organizations and then the tipping point gets found. But it’s not just there it’s on the whole election debate. We’re going to talk about that, because new evidence has come out with this blockbuster documentary from Dinesh D’Souza which is going be very hard for the left in substance to dismiss. Because it’s based on the one area where America is willing to defer to special evidence and that’s the area of technology.
Technology used by the FBI used by criminal agencies to identify and triangulate and locate everything from potential crime that’s been done to the way in they tracked the insurrectionists that went into the Capitol on January 6th, according to their narrative. They used that technology that Dinesh points out at the Capitol to identify everyone who went into the Capitol by tracing these little devices called cellphones. That’s the technology D’Souza and through the vote worked with in order to do the same thing with the ballot stuffing scheme that we’re going to talk about in today’s broadcast. Which is that technology shows you the exact location and traffic and travels of individuals. Reason why his document is called 2000 Mules because a Mule is a word that describes the drug carriers and the money carriers with the cartels.
So, we’re going to look at the organized theft of the election and see it from a data point of view rather than from a frustrated bread crumb train which we’ve been working with for so long. What about this? What about that? Well, we’ve now got something scientific going to be very hard for the left to deal with could be argued Mercedes that the whole leaking of the Supreme Court document and the distraction of that issue now. Some people say is done because they want to block the documentary, but I’m going to throw it over to you and you can deal with either one. Either the Roe V Wade document, the Alito document.
Mercedes: I think he’s not the whole show in like 8 minutes. It was like the craziest thing. It’s like the whole intro of 8 minutes. We’re going to talk about this. We’re going to talk about this. I’m like we should.
Lance: I’m setting up the agenda. I mean, look I’m cold. I’m thawing out. I’m getting my brain working to keep my body moving. I’m going to start on fire here on my desk in a minute.
Mercedes: You literally covered all the stories in 8 minutes. So, to tease them back out.
Lance: Did I bury the lead? Did I bury the whole cemetery?
Mercedes: Complete opposite. You gave all the leads in 8 minutes.
Lance: Oh, maybe I was confusing a cold open with the actual podcast.
Mercedes: No, it’s good. That’s good. I would say where I would start if we want to deep dive into one of these subjects you outlined. I think because we went to the 2000 Mules movie last night. You, me, Carl, Annabelle, Joy, we all went down there. Jonathan couldn’t make it. But it was really interesting. So, I thought it was unique. Obviously, we’ve been covering it. You’ve been covering it. We’ve had John Graves here leading up like the probably the last what 8 weeks. We’ve been talking about how this whole thing went. And you’re talking about these ballot trafficking mules who would go and collect these blank ballots from their alleging, from all these non-profit organizations and then drop them off in ballot boxes.
So, last night and I didn’t realize this when John was saying given us a data the criteria for the 2000 Mules that they identified just in Atlanta. That criteria was that, that particular cellphone like you said that they were went to 10 different ballot drop off boxes and at least three non-profit organizations.
Lance: So, let me point this out now. I’ve got my trustee whiteboard. Here are you guys ready? I have my whiteboard capabilities.
Mercedes: Don’t forget we have a lot of podcast listeners.
Lance: Oh, podcast I’m going to make this very super fit. I’ll make this fast. So, let’s say that this is the area they’re looking at in Atlanta, they geofence. First technical word, they geofence, because they’re going to create a perimeter then they’re going to track the pings of the cellphone devices. You’re saying the criteria was there had to be at least 3 nonprofits. They’re in red circles here if you can imagine this. They had to go to at least three although they have numerous nonprofit 501 C3s funded by the left and to the tune of some $500 million dollars all for the purpose democracy. But in fact, serving the ballot drop off scheme, if you want to think about it this way.
So, the nonprofits provide ballots and they provide cash. Now the mules have to go to I’m going to put all these what was the number of drop off point ballot boxes?
Lance: At least 10 is what the criteria was off the cellphone data. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. So, here was the deal. They would have to go to 10 drop box locations and they would have to visit 3 of the nonprofit coordinating points. And if they met, if in that geo targeted area, geofenced area, they had people that went to 10, at least 10 drop box locations. Which you would only go to one to drop off of a vote.
Mercedes: One ballot sure.
Lance: So, now if you’re doing ten and if you’re doing them between the hours of let’s say 12 midnight and 12, let’s be 12 AM, right?
Jonathan: 12 AM.
Lance: 12 AM and 5 AM. It’s highly suspicious that you’d be going to ten locations but to be doing it over the course of three days or so is even weirder. 3 days from midnight to 5:00, going to ten locations, going to three of these nonprofit bases. Why are you going to those bases? What are you picking up and why are you going to 10 locations and doing it between midnight and 5:00 AM? That’s what D’Souza along with video footage is going to be exposing.
Mercedes: And then there’s another day where you can watch this in the actual theater and then I think it gets released everywhere. But not only are they going to the drop box locations, they’re going to go to drop box locations and then go to another nonprofit to pick up more ballots. And then they go to more drop box locations then they go to another nonprofit.
Lance: Okay, right.
Mercedes: The other thing that they said in the movie and you see and I think we showed some of this footage. But they would actually have to start taking photos at one point where they like fan the ballots out and they take a photo. Because you had to start showing that you actually dropped a bunch of ballots off in order to get paid, which is wild. This was also really crazy to me. I don’t remember John saying this when he was on the program, but the same cellphones that they tracked of their 200 Mules that they looked at all that cellphone data they purchased, right. And they isolated those particular numbers.
They said that they could then match them they went and pulled cellphone data for where a lot of the riots were happening when we had our summer of riots. And they noticed that it was the same, I think they said almost 60 of the 200 were showing up at those protests quote unquote protests and so same people are showing up. So, they’re alleging. I mean what they’re insinuating and correct me if I’m wrong that these are really people who are paid and hired to be activists.
Lance: So, if you take 60 and this is all over the riots and these were individuals who were identified. The FBI knows the information. As to individuals who were where there was firebombing or violence and stores broken. In other words, your most violent activists with Antifa and BLM that are on the payroll to be your organizers, were 60 of them were identified specifically out of the 250. They were looking for in the Atlanta geofence. What’s the likelihood that be coming in from all over the United States and working during that period of time and they’re the ones with the cellphones and which begs the question.
Once the facts came out, they went to Kemp, they went to Georgia, they met with them, they went to the FBI, they showed them what they had. And instead of them welcoming the information. I’m telling you; this is what’s going to cut into the Kemp re-election strategy in Georgia. They suppressed and resisted the investigation. They didn’t want the facts to come out.
Mercedes: Well and to go along with that also they had at the end of the movie they did this interesting segment, where they total up the they run an equation, right. So, they say okay let’s assume these 200 mules were doing an average of 10 ballots a day and they do a certain amount of time and they can show you this is how many ballots were probably artificially put in election.
Lance: 10 ballots a day. It would be a minimum of 3 at each drop box location. So, that means that they’re going to ten that would be 30 at least 30 a day. and some of them that they have were doing considerably more. Because what we saw in video footage is stacks of ballots. So, thick they couldn’t fit them in the box and they were having to break them into sections or they were falling out and they had to pick them up and keep stuffing them in. so, you have a minimum of 3 or that’s 30 to maybe 100 or 200 ballots per mule.
Mercedes: Per day.
Lance: Yeah, per trip.
Mercedes: And so, I was hard to take it in all at the end there and I wish I just had that one segment from the movie. But what’s cool is they end up giving you a total like fake ballot count essentially of this is how many votes probably went into Georgia that were fake. This is how many that probably went into Arizona. This is how many that went into Pennsylvania based off of the data that they have. And that’s where they get the 2000 mules from, because we just kind of isolated Georgia in our show but then they start retotling the electoral college. Because let’s not forget, Georgia was won by, what was it 12,000 votes, 15,000 votes.
Lance: It’s like 10,000 votes.
Mercedes: Yeah, Arizona.
Lance: Arizona, 10,000.
Mercedes: Same story and so you’re within a margin of error. So, then what they did is because the criteria is so insane to me. It’s like 10 drop box locations and 3 of these nonprofits, like that’s crazy criteria. I mean those are real offenders.
Lance: I think it was 3 to 5. 3 was minimum, like 3 to 5 is average.
Mercedes: Yeah, and well and then what was wild is they said, okay, let’s just drop the criteria for out of all the cellphone data of where these devices went. How many people just went to 5 locations and then went to like 2 of these nonprofits and I think it jumped up to like 20,000 or something like that.
Lance: Right.
Mercedes: Like 20,000 devices and then they redid the equation and so forget dominion. Forget all the other stuff. Just this story is enough to sit and say our election process isn’t secure. Mail inbounding was exploited. And there’s more than enough evidence to question the integrity of this election.
Lance: Yeah, and so as I understand this, they not only tracked information data in Georgia. They went to Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania and they were able to replicate the same geofenced phenomena in those States, swing States. Which were overwhelmingly decisive as swing states and that were the news were shut down overnight. And those are the states where surprise, surprise the votes were found.
Mercedes: And one of the reasons they needed to even do this documentary is the fact that, so when we say they they’re tracking devices or they have the cellphone number or something like that. It is not somebody’s personal ID. Only law enforcement can do that. It’s almost like an ad ID. That’s essentially what you’re buying is data of based off of the type of apps that you have on your phone. It’s public data everybody has. They can track us wherever we go and marketers can purchase that information. Like if we ever wanted to run ads to people who would be interested in our next Lance event. I could go back 6 years and pull anybody that’s been to a Christian event on the National Mall and geofence that and target and run ads to them on their cellphone. That’s the power of this technology.
So, what our side did is we took that technology and said, let’s see if can pinpoint where these people are going. The problem is, when you say it was brought to law enforcement, nothing’s been done. What happened? If we know who those 200 or 2000 people are, law enforcement needs to unlock and say, Apple, you need to tell us based off of this ID, who are these people? I didn’t see that covered in there. Was it did they talk about law enforcement?
Lance: Well, this was the embarrassing part when we had Dinesh D’Souza on Flash Point. And my question to him was intuitively, I went right to that. I said, we should be able to identify who the mules were clearly. They’ve got a cellphone and at the end of the day they all stayed somewhere overnight with the cellphone, so you see where they’re living. And if they’re at a hotel, you see what hotel they checked into if they’re from out of State. So, you can identify who they are. Can you do it accurately? Here’s the piece that they gave that I think you didn’t catch which was just a throw aside.
It was that they had tracked thousands of us who went up on January 6th in order to support the president, so that we could say we are standing for election integrity. We want our congressman to do and we want Pence to do the right thing. We want this thing to be going back to the states to investigate voter fraud. And they had before we went to Washington, they tracked. The government had tracked thousands of people who were going. How do we know that? Because here’s what they said.
It’s impossible for you to simply start at the Capitol and then go to the courts and get the courts to approve for you to go show up at the house and arrest and bring into court unless they had previous information already established. Which means they weren’t collecting data, they already had data and then were ready to pull the trigger on everyone that went into the Capitol. They already had the data in advance on who was going. They were track the conservatives that were protesting in order to find out who went into the Capitol. Which raises the whole question as to what degree was it set up to get them in there. Because they were able within 3 days to extradite go arrest identify and bring them in. which is impossible from a data process point of view, because it’s trillions of terabytes of data you have to process which is why it took so long for them to do this election fraud case. Because they weren’t working with pre-information like the government was working with trying to trap or target conservatives a win to the Capitol.
Mercedes: Wow. Well and so but did Dinesh have answer though, because that’s what I didn’t catch in the document.
Lance: Oh yeah, my question to him was, why is it the FBI going after the payment process?
Mercedes: Yeah.
Lance: Because I want to know if it was $10 as they have some whistle blowers that are already coming out. If it’s $10 per ballot they were paid, who paid them? It was the nonprofits that disperse the money. Who funded the nonprofits? What’s the wire transfer process for funding from what sources to the nonprofits that were dispensed as payment to the ballots? And the fact that the FBI and this this is if I’m not mistaken this is a federal crime and in Georgia it’s specifically listed as such. If now with this information going out, if we fail to put pressure on law enforcement to do the right thing, it’s a failure of us. Because we’ve now got the evidence and so the next stage is going to come out.
The thing I asked Dinesh was why aren’t we going after these individuals? Why aren’t we calling them in for questioning? Why aren’t we compiling information on the funding and why aren’t we prosecuting the sources? And he moved on from the question because that really is where we go after the documentary comes out.
Mercedes: Yeah, and it goes back to Raffensberger and Kemp and we also need to put pressure on them to say, listen, here’s the information. It’s right here in the documentary. They even had eyewitness is. I mean we’re blurred out because they’re for fear of their life, but they’re up there saying yeah, I watched checks go. I watched people go and pick up checks.
Lance: And cash.
Lance: And cash after dropping off ballots. And so, there’s I mean and also, I believe there’s an actual whistle blower who was one of these mules. I don’t know if that was in the movie or not, but I know I’ve heard about that where he said yeah, I was paid $10 a ballot. And then they said it was even more in the Georgia Election run off. It was more than $10 a ballot. It’s just wild.
Lance: And there’s more stories than that. Stuff that they didn’t put in there which was the physical violence that was done to some of the guys that were coming in with evidence. That they were like hospitalized. So, it’s oh you can imagine the sixty some that are actual violent agitators would go after the people that would be. So, it’s like an organized crime thing. Carl, you were there. I’m curious about this. So, you’re there and thanks for showing up with the podcast team. So, you and I were sitting in the very back of the and it’s kind of like yeah and you’re totally neutral on this stuff which is like I obviously I’m wanting. Well, I don’t know that you’re totally neutral but let’s just say that you weren’t going in like I was to say, yeah, we finally got the evidence. You’re going in to go make the case. Was the case made adequately to you as a neutral observer?
Carl: No. There was a lot of good points that were made but a number of the points that they made were superficial it seemed to me. For one, in my opinion, their ability to collect this type of information is in my opinion an infringement of the 4th Amendment. Which is the right to protection to you, yourself, your assets, your personhood. The fact that marketers can just grab this stuff. We really need to have a different conversation surrounding our rights as far as privacy is concerned.
Secondarily, a number of the points that they made as far as these mules allegedly going to these different drop boxes and tracking them. They didn’t actually show one person going to these locations. They showed footage from different drop boxes of people dropping things off and mass. And a number of those locations that they showed, it’s totally legal for people to harvest those votes and then drop them off for somebody else. As you mentioned, in Georgia, that’s illegal unless you’re a family relative. If you’re a family relative, it’s okay to collect your family’s votes and then drop those off.
Lance: So, let me see if I got your argument correctly. You think it’s an infringement on your rights of privacy but you were disappointed we didn’t have more rights of privacy data the people on video so we didn’t have more better.
Carl: No. And it’s the job of the communicator to make sure they’re understood so that’s on me. What I’m saying is beyond this whole argument we need to have a separate conversation about the 4th Amendment and what our rights look like now in the digital age. That’s point one. Point 2, was that the argument they were making that these alleged mules and I’ll say alleged, because I think they are but again I didn’t necessarily get convinced through the video. These alleged mules doing these drop offs, it might not necessarily be quite a one. The way that they’re picking up these geotags isn’t by a square cubic meter or like a single area, a square cubic foot. It’s based on pings from digital information. And the way that cellphones pick up on pings from different digital location is usually through triangulation.
So, it’s not just this one location is where they were for sure for sure based on the argument that I saw in the movie. It was that they were in proximity to these locations and this is the route that we would circuitously say they went to. So, it wasn’t a GPS, okay, you’re right here you’re going up you’re going to make a left. It was, okay they were in this area why would they be in that area and so there’s speculation as to why they were in that area.
Mercedes: I’m going to speak to that though, because I actually my background’s marketing. So, you can geofence a specific area and it does give you latitude and longitude. It will not go up right, so like if I’m going to do.
Carl: We’ll do the Z-axis.
Mercedes: Exactly. So, if I want to do like a marketing conference happens to me all the time, I’ll go to a marketing conference and it’s like hey Welcome to such and such. Come to visit us booth 50. I mean, they’re wagering that everybody in that hotel that they just geofence is probably going to go to that conference and so you’re going to get targeted if you’re seeing the ad, you pay for the ad. But you can get very specific and it is a latitude and a longitude. But I think Carl, even more alarming though and I hear what you’re saying on the digital bill of rights, that needs to happen. That’s something that needs to take place. So hard to talk to you. You’re over here and I’m looking here but yes, to the Bill of Rights. The other thing though is in the video footage, I would have liked to see that too where we’re seeing here’s person A at location one.
Carl: Yes.
Mercedes: Here’s person A at location 3. That would have been really like cool to see. One of the problems we have in doing that. And I believe John shared this on the show is that the state of Georgia was supposed to maintain those video files and they did not. Also, it’s mandated by the State, there needs to be a video camera on those locations. And many of them did not even have a video camera.
Lance: Like 5 out of 6 had their videos disabled. How they showed that segment? In Michigan they didn’t have them operating and on something like this and to an earlier point you made you could see someone yes; you’re innocently dropping off a ballot for this or 4 or 5 people that weren’t able to.
Carl: For their coworkers, for their families.
Lance: Yeah. But if you’re going to 10 in a night for 3 nights in a row, you’re clearly doing an Uber delivery service. You’re not just taking care of your aunts in the rest home.
Carl: Well, again allegedly I didn’t know about the longitudinal latitude, they may mention that. Again, it was a lot of information. It’s an information dense movie and I do recommend it. It’s quite illuminating.
Mercedes: Yeah.
Carl: But I missed that part. And then like you mentioned Mercedes. I would have loved it if they had person A going to multiple on footage dropping those things off.
Mercedes: And they may have that. We could even ask John what they might have done is tried to show a variety of people in the movie so you realize it isn’t just one person. Because they showed four or five and then they had a like a specific people putting just wads of ballots in. And then they had a big screen where it was like almost like I mean must have been 60 different feeds. So, maybe it would they just didn’t have that thought process of putting in the movie.
Carl: Possibly.
Lance: Or the lady that has the gloves on so that she doesn’t have finger prints left behind.
Carl: I’m glad that you brought that up because that was a very interesting point. The fact that the video footage showed these people, these mules, alleged mules doing these drop offs with gloves the day after the FBI was able to recon or get some information on people based on fingerprints. So, that was an interesting distinction there. Now regarding that one woman who did take her gloves off and she didn’t even see the garbage can like there’s so many different ways that that could have happened.
Because she didn’t make visible eye contact on the trash can walking up the ballot box doesn’t mean she didn’t see it. Also, she may have gone to that location before. She may have known that was there. I don’t think that it was like when you go to this location directly opposite is going to be this trash can. That’s where you will get rid of your gloves. I don’t think that it’s quite like that personally. But again, there’s a lot of room for speculation. And that was kind of my issue as far as being convinced wholeheartedly that what they’re saying was accurate.
Mercedes: Well and I think too another kind of like remarkable scene in the movie, because they were talking about well where are the ballots coming from? It’s one thing to all the ballots into the drop box. It’s another thing to say well where are they coming from? And they had discussed how really how nursing homes are very exploited or how people with really failing ailing health have actually been voting for the last 10 years. Family members who are shocked to find out. That oh my mom’s been voting for 10 years. What is that about? And so, they were saying, they had like a I think political analyst on their election specialist. Where he was saying, if you’re on the voting role and you haven’t voted in the last like 5 years, there’s a good chance you’re not going to vote this year and so they’ll go target. It sounded like they were going to go target that person to put a ballot in for them.
So, and he explores it on both sides, left and right with elections being stolen. Also, the idea that this may not even be the first election that was stolen. They listed a couple different elections at the beginning. I mean John F Kennedy you’ve mentioned that and a couple other ones. So, it’s really, I would encourage everybody to go see. I know Carl’s comments sometimes like the libertarian on the team here. It’s good to hear that though, because that’s what your family members are going to say. I mean, the reality is it’s like, we are like a family and so we all have somebody that’s like Carl that’s got those questions. And you got to be willing to have the dialogue. We got to be willing to have the conversation in love and to say, well, this is what I thought. This is what I took away. Did you catch that?
Well, actually geo-targeting works like this and you a friendly dialogue about it. But I mean for me in watching the movie I felt like there were things that I hadn’t heard John discuss before when he was on the program with us. I think it’s a movie everybody’s got to go see.
Lance: Imagine the self-control, it takes for me to have seen this. 6 months ago, John showed me, John Gray’s works with True the Vote and the data process. He showed me the videos and showed me the data, and I couldn’t say anything. I literally had to just bite myself people to say that I can’t keep a secret or maybe I shouldn’t have said John showed it to me. Alright, maybe that maybe there’s a point there to your point.
Carl: [INAUDIBLE WORD 34:19].
Lance: But what I want to say is, I go back to my whiteboard here. Go back to my whiteboard. So, if you are saying to me that you go to these many locations between midnight and 5 AM and you’re doing this and you’re taking pictures of your quantity drop off and you’re doing this plus you’re going to these. This is not your typical use of a dropping off a ballot for 3 days for someone that wasn’t able to place it. This is a cash business going on. So, and this isn’t just there in Georgia, this is Arizona. And by the way the curious thing about this is that True the Vote is not a Republican voting organization that did the research.
They were in dispense in overturning a Republican Congressman in North Carolina who won the vote, who won the seat in Congress. Guy by the name of Harris who lost it, because ballot harvesting of this type was found done by somebody who was a campaign worker for the Republican Party. Which was going around and collecting ballots in bulk and delivering them without proper chain of custody evidence in North Carolina. So, True the Vote there the point is this isn’t a conservative organization finally doing a got you. This is a company that’s committed to election integrity period.
Carl: Yeah, I’m glad that you brought that up because even in the film they talk about how this isn’t a non-partisan issue. This is a bipartisan issue. Because both sides are the ones who are doing this.
Lance: Yeah, it’s Republicans could be doing it just as well as Democrats. But I think the evidence here is that all the down ballots were Republican victories and the presidential was lost because they had to keep Trump out of the White House. And that was where it became so strange.
Carl: Yeah.
Lance: That you had this down ballot Republicans and then at the top, it’s Biden. Biden. Biden. They didn’t even bother to mess with the other and I think it’s because of the urgency of getting that surge out in those 5 States. They had a plan. And folks if they had a plan, then you got to, I know your anxieties. My audience going to be, well, how do you know that they aren’t going to do that in midterms? Because they did it in Georgia for the runoff what’s maddening is with all the heat that came in with the ballots coming out of suitcases and everyone leaving the polling area in Atlanta and then bringing them out and processing. You’d think that they’d be self-conscious about doing it in the runoff elections or in the post elections in January 5th in Georgia.
But no, the evidence is that the teams were out at work doing it for round two and there still wasn’t independent video surveillance. The Republican National Committee is so lousy. I mean they got $80 million with which to secure election integrity. They didn’t check on videos and they didn’t even show up to back up the true the Vote argument when they had the evidence, they didn’t support them. Both parties and the way that I’m now going to position myself in this as a neutral as a 501 C3 even talking about stuff is to say that it’s not about Democrats are bad. It’s Republicans and Democrats are both dangerous to democracy, if the people don’t get involved with sorting out their government.
Mercedes: I like that. I wasn’t sure what you’re going to say but it’s a little I was like, oh because we don’t this isn’t necessarily part of our 501 C3.
Lance: No, this isn’t but I’m saying I do talk. I do talk when I travel and I do bring it up and I bring up the fact that with that we have an artificial engagement from these things. If Christian leaders and ministers and pastors aren’t willing to get out there and talk about this stuff, they’re failing their people and the people are going to find people that’ll speak in their interest. They’re going to speak to the to the issues they need to cover. So, Jonathan, you’re listening to all this. You remember John Graves being here. Do you have any thoughts on the matter?
Jonathan: So, I’m actually really excited for all of those that have not got an opportunity to watch it in theaters. They will be having a virtual preview at 8 PM Eastern, 7 PM Central, which I will be watching with my family. I know it’s Mother’s Day, so it’s a great time to bond over that like Mercedes was saying good family conversations and stuff. It’s Saturday as well.
Mercedes: Nice.
Jonathan: It is not on Mother’s Day Mother’s Day Sunday the preview is on Saturday evening.
Lance: Remember your mother on Mother’s Day. Remember that.
Mercedes: That’s awesome. I love that. Well, it was funny last night too because we’re going to meet everybody at the movies. I was driving Lance and Lance is like I’ve decided, I’m going to introduce the movie Dinesh can’t be there. And so, he did this whole voicemail or Joy where he was like I’m just going to go up there. What did you say?
Lance: Well, I said look the whole theater’s going to be filled with our tribe, our kind of people. I just think that I should assume that I should get up there in the theater in Grapevine and welcome the people. We’re glad they’re there. Danish is in here right now. Fill in for him and I’m interested in your comments afterwards. So, and I did. I recorded and posted on Facebook.
Mercedes: You did.
Lance: Comments of people exiting the theater just so that I …
Mercedes: A single group at Gateway.
Lance: It was a singles group.
Carl: At the end of the movie. Didn’t something happen when you walk into the theater?
Mercedes: Yes, an applause.
Lance: Oh, there was.
Mercedes: I just walked into the theater and people it was like the back row was like.
Lance: Yes, there was an eruption of applause. There was a recognition I suppose you could say in my Frasier moment here. They did recognize me.
Carl: One of the funniest things too about the movie. It was more so the audience in the movie. But it starts with that blurb from Biden where he talks about how we have assembled the greatest crack team of voter fraud ever. And the audience actually started booing. And I was like, oh, it’s one of those shows. And then at near the tail end Dennis Prager there all the broadcasters not all of them, but a lot of the conservative broadcasters of Salem are together in the movie a handful of times. And Dennis Prager is like after watching this I want to fight the left with every fiber of my being. I swear this dude got a standing ovation.
Lance: That was the only time and what’s funny is he’s the one Orthodox Jew and everyone else is an evangelical that are claims to be evangelical. It’s like Eric Matt says Charlie Kirk they’re all being interviewed and as Dennis Prager. And what the interesting thing was the first interview with and Sebastian Gorka. And the first interview with Dinesh has shown I don’t want to give the whole thing away, but it opens up with them sharing the fact that they all believe that there was something wrong with the election, but that there was no singular argument that they could fix on that they would use in order to make the point. It was just highly suspicious. But then he went back to them after they saw the information and there was a universal sense of you got to be kidding me.
Mercedes: Yeah. No, absolutely and anybody’s going to fight anybody. I think Eric would be the one that’s going to like throw hands. Remember when he clothesline that guy when he’s riding on the bike?
Lance: Eric got away with it.
Mercedes: Eric ran back. Everybody knew it was Eric. Everybody knows it was.
Lance: Who else has a pink jacket on in the middle.
Mercedes: Green slacks in a vest.
Lance: Jogging and doing his taekwondo move with a bicycle guy trying to hit him.
Carl: But Eric Metaxas in that double breasted blazer. I mean he stole the show, the green pants.
Lance: But he did influence me by the way with my style with the handkerchief. This is large in Eric Metaxas innovation. Notice this here people.
Mercedes: You know what I thought when they assembled that crew is Charlie Kirk, Larry elder
Lance: Sebastian Gorco.
Mercedes: Yeah,
Lance: With relief factor
Mercedes: I was wondering where Lance was.
Lance: Yeah, well it bothers me. It bothers me and I want to I want to point out that they. No, my own defense. My own defense. I declined a Salem contract. They’re all Salem podcast. Salem is a producer for this. Did you see that?
Mercedes: Yeah. Oh.
Lance: Salem is a producer.
Mercedes: Alright.
Lance: They were all Salem podcasters. I myself opted not to be. I’ll leave it there.
Mercedes: We might edit it out. We’ll see.
Lance: Anyway. Oh, it’s 41 minutes into the show. I can’t believe it. Look, I’m going to have to wrap this up. We didn’t even get into the big issue of Roe V Wade, but we’re going to have to tease it a little bit. Talk about it and then we’ll come in on the next show and cover it.
Mercedes: I was going to say this is a spicy meatball. We can’t even air this one on Facebook. It’s all.
Lance: Well, what? I didn’t mention anything about Facebook in this.
Mercedes: No. We talk all about election fraud. Can’t even say a word on Facebook, YouTube.
Carl: We know how Facebook is going to feel about the movie in part because of where some of the funding came from.
Mercedes: Correct.
Carl: For some of the activities that are inside of it. So, I mean it’s worse one.
Lance: Facebook been very very good to me.
Mercedes: Why are you doing Marsha’s accent?
Lance: No, it’s an SNL routine from Roberto Clemente. You missed you missed it in the 90s. You weren’t watching it, I think.
Mercedes: I was 10.
Lance: Baseball been better. You were 10. That’s right. Yeah, that’s right.
Mercedes: Or not even in the 90s. I would have been 6. 6 or 7.
Lance: Well, today’s broadcast has been brought to you by my friend Mike Lindell who by the way was on Twitter. He went recently got put back on Twitter for 24 hours. He got kicked off again. Poor guy. He didn’t last 24 hours on Twitter. He just got reinstated and just left.
Mercedes: It was 3 hours.
Lance: Oh 3 hours?
Mercedes: Yeah.
Lance: Mike Lindell. But you see these people? These are the slippers that make a difference. If you’re walking with these. Look at this. I even have the My Slipper. Oh, I didn’t know. These are brand new. This is the genuine leather upper with the soft cozy lining indoor outdoor outsoles. I wear these of course every day at night when I do my Lance Rant, I put on my Mike Lindell bathrobe and my slippers and I share with you the summary of the day, 15 minutes. If you missed the day, I give you the salient prophetic perspective on the big stories which are not always covered by the news cycle which is sensational.
But Mike Lindell, his not just the pillows but it’s the bathrobes and the slippers that I’m particularly enthusiastic about. I want you guys to go to “Mikepillow.com”. Use the promo code Lance to get up to 50 or 60% off of those products and join me for the Lance Rant that are on at night. I want to thank you for today’s show. I’m going to be coming back again tomorrow and I want to zero in on this significance of what is happening with the State’s, sheep and goat states is what I’ve been saying. It’s going to come down to sheep and goats in nations and we’re starting to see territories. States are going to define themselves more and more clearly by the moral characteristics of the voting populace. And it’s going to, we’re going to find a very interesting period of time coming up that’s.
Remember that “Mypillow.com”. Use promo code Lance, you can help us out to keep our show on the air. You can help out Mike Lindell a true patriot and who’s 3 hours of Twitter. Hopefully, will be restored. Once Elon Musk continues traumatizing the Twitter team, he’s threatened to move them curious enough out of San Francisco. I guess where their bases, their offices thinking about taking them to Texas. Because that’s where, you’re not excited about Twitter locating here, you’d rather see them in Florida.
Mercedes: Yeah, no I’d stay out of don’t California my Texas man. Thank you, we got enough Californians here. Let’s disciple them first, get them trained on how they should be voting.
Lance: I know they’re coming over here by droves. But we just hope they don’t bring their politics with them. They’re escaping the war zones to come here.
Mercedes: Yeah, and then they’re going to bring all the craziness here.
Lance: Oh well. Let’s be charitable. We we’ll invite them over for a soiree.
Mercedes: Oh, what are we going to have?
Lance: I like the word soiree. I’m not sure what it is but it sounds fun.
Mercedes: It’s the scarf.
Lance: It’s a scarf. The scarf is my soiree moment. Alright, listen ladies and gentlemen, I’m so glad you could join us here buddy. Like and subscribe whatever platform you’re watching on, whether it’s on Rumble, whether it’s on Getter. Whether it’s on Getter, because they don’t have videos but if you’re watching. I can’t even where I can’t, how much are this going to put on YouTube?
Mercedes: We can’t. But for the beginning part where you summarize the episode for 9 minutes.
Lance: That’s it. I need to add this. By the way you’re not going to be able to see that broadcast here. So, come join us on where would they go? “Lancewallnaushow.com”.
Mercedes: The podcast.
Lance: The podcast? Is it a dot com?
Mercedes: Hold on. Go to “Lancewallnau.com/podcast” to listen to it. That’s it. You can watch on Rumble. We could watch the full episode there, but the excerpts are going to have to be a go up on Facebook and on YouTube.
Lance: It’ll be short excerpts, I’m sure. Love you go on guys. I’ll see you all later. Bye-bye.
Closing: Thanks for listening to this Lance Wallnau broadcast. If you enjoyed today’s show, make sure to subscribe and share the episode. See you tomorrow.